AML · Country & sector risk

Defensible AML risk intelligence for modern compliance teams.

A quantitative risk model covering 240+ jurisdictions, with regional and national variants for the EU, US, Germany and France — embedded directly in your platform, your workflow, and your audit trail.

Country & sector coverage
FATF & EU-aligned methodology
Monthly + ad-hoc FATF plenary & EU HRTC updates
User-friendly interface and API & MCP data access
aml-country-risk · live preview
Iran
86.4
Very High
Switzerland
21.5
Low
Germany
23.4
Low
United Arab Emirates
44.8
Medium
United States
27.7
Low
Myanmar
83.7
Very High
United Kingdom
22.9
Low
Brazil
39.1
Medium
Angola
53.6
High
France
17.0
Low
Iran
86.4
Very High
Switzerland
21.5
Low
Germany
23.4
Low
United Arab Emirates
44.8
Medium
United States
27.7
Low
Myanmar
83.7
Very High
United Kingdom
22.9
Low
Brazil
39.1
Medium
Angola
53.6
High
France
17.0
Low
249 JURISDICTIONSUPDATED 28 JUN 2026
FATF mutual evaluation reportsEU high-risk third countries listUN & OFAC sanctionsFinCEN advisoriesOrganised Crime IndexFinancial Secrecy IndexOECD tax transparencyWorldwide Governance IndicatorsFATF mutual evaluation reportsEU high-risk third countries listUN & OFAC sanctionsFinCEN advisoriesOrganised Crime IndexFinancial Secrecy IndexOECD tax transparencyWorldwide Governance Indicators
Jurisdictions covered
249
Regional versions
5Global · EU · US · DE · FR
Sector assessments
500+
Update cadence
Monthly+ FATF/EU HRTC
Delivery
Platform+ API + MCP + XLS
[ 01 ] The problem

Why existing AML risk frameworks fall short.

Most AML programs still rely on fragmented, inconsistent, and difficult-to-explain risk intelligence frameworks. The supervisory bar has moved — the tooling hasn't.

CHALLENGE / 01

Static country lists

Many compliance teams still rely on manual country classifications and outdated spreadsheets that don't reflect current FATF or EU positions.

CHALLENGE / 02

Regulatory complexity

Financial institutions face overlapping AML frameworks and jurisdiction-specific requirements that are difficult to reconcile.

CHALLENGE / 03

Fragmented data sources

Risk intelligence is often distributed across multiple vendors and internal systems — each with its own update cadence.

CHALLENGE / 04

Limited monitoring

Many frameworks lack dynamic updates or integrated monitoring capabilities tied to regulatory events.

CHALLENGE / 05

Poor explainability

Regulators increasingly expect transparent and auditable risk rationale — not black-box scoring.

CHALLENGE / 06

Weak sector coverage

Sector risk is often treated inconsistently despite being a critical AML risk dimension under the EU AMLR and FATF guidance.

[ 02 ] The model

Four risk sections.
One transparent score.

Every country is independently assessed across four sections, then aggregated with clearly defined weights. No black boxes, no manual overrides — just a defensible number you can explain to a regulator.

SECTION 01 · 20%

Inherent risks

The prevalence and impact of criminal activities that generate illicit financial flows — corruption, drug-related crime, organised crime, fraud and tax evasion.

Organised Crime Index
Human Trafficking Index
Corruption Perceptions
Cybercrime exposure
… and many more
SECTION 02 · 45%

Money Laundering Assessment, Regulation & Enforcement

FATF mutual evaluations, sanctions exposure, and external AML risk classifications — automatically incorporating jurisdiction-relevant high-risk lists.

FATF MERs
EU high-risk list
UN & OFAC sanctions
FinCEN advisories
… and many more
SECTION 03 · 25%

Institutional Quality

Rule of law, governance, and the operational capacity of supervisory and enforcement bodies — the controls that translate paper rules into real outcomes.

Worldwide Governance Indicators
Rule of Law Index
Open Budget Index
Judicial independence
… and many more
SECTION 04 · 10%

Transparency

Financial secrecy, tax transparency, and beneficial-ownership disclosure standards — the structural conditions that allow illicit flows to hide.

Financial Secrecy Index
OECD Tax Transparency
UBO registry coverage
AEoI participation
… and many more
S0120%
S0245%
S0325%
S0410%
View full methodology
[ 03 ] Jurisdiction variants

One scalable framework.
Five regulatory views.

Each variant automatically incorporates the relevant high-risk country lists — FATF grey/black, the EU list of high-risk third countries, the EU non-cooperative tax list, FinCEN special measures, Annex 4 of the German NRA, and the French non-cooperative tax list. By embedding these lists directly into the classification logic, we remove the need for manual overrides.

Global base version

DEFAULT

FATF grey & black lists, UN sanctions. The decision-grade default for any cross-border workflow.

FATF GREY/BLACK · UN SANCTIONS

European Union

EU

Layers in the EU list of high-risk third countries and the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.

+ EU HRTC · EU NON-COOP TAX

United States

US

Adds FinCEN special-measures designations under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act.

+ FINCEN SPECIAL MEASURES

Germany

DE

Incorporates Annex 4 of the German National Risk Assessment (NRA) and BaFin-flagged exposures.

+ NRA ANNEX 4 · BaFin

France

FR

Incorporates the French list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (ETNC).

+ ETNC · DGT WATCHLIST

Bespoke variants

ON REQUEST

Custom variants built to match your internal AML policy, supervisory expectations, and proprietary watchlists.

CUSTOM POLICY · LISTS · WEIGHTS
[ 04 ] Sector risk assessments

Structured ML/TF vulnerability analysis
across 500+ sectors.

Each sector is independently scored on an eight-dimensional framework, then mapped to four major industry classifications so it slots cleanly into your existing taxonomy.

Classification mappings
NACE Rev. 2.1
EU statistical classification
NAICS 2022
North American industry codes
GICS
Global Industry Classification
WZ2025
German classification
Scoring · 0–5 scale · cross-sector comparable
Eight-dimensional framework
01Sector characteristics
02Customer risk
03Product / service risk
04Transaction risk
05Geographic risk
06Regulatory environment
07Delivery channels
08Criminal typology exposure
[ 05 ] See it in action

Watch the AML platform work.

Short product walkthroughs — the AML Insights platform and the AML data package, end to end.

app.countryrisk.io — AML Insights walkthrough
Insights
[ 06 ] Score data sample

What the data
actually looks like.

A 40-jurisdiction extract from the Global Base variant — every score traces back to its source indicators and the override list that produced its category.

40 jurisdictions · Global Base · as of 28 Jun 2026Score scale 0 – 100 · lower = lower risk
CountryISORisk scoreCategoryOverride rationaleParent jurisdiction
Afghanistan
AFG77.7Very High
EU high-risk third country
Angola
AGO53.6High
FATF grey-listEU high-risk third country
Åland Islands
ALA7.5Very Low
Finland
Burundi
BDI57.0Very High
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
BES23.1Low
Netherlands
Bulgaria
BGR34.7High
FATF grey-list
Saint Barthélemy
BLM17.0Low
France
Cook Islands
COK22.2Low
Comoros
COM43.5Medium
Curaçao
CUW25.0Low
Cayman Islands
CYM23.6Low
Algeria
DZA54.8High
EU high-risk third country
Egypt
EGY40.5Medium
Faroe Islands
FRO13.0Very Low
Denmark
United Kingdom
GBR22.9Low
Greenland
GRL17.1Low
Hungary
HUN31.7Medium
Iran
IRN86.4Very High
FATF black-listEU high-risk third countryFinCEN 311 measure
Iceland
ISL9.4Very Low
Japan
JPN17.4Low
Kiribati
KIR38.1Medium
Kuwait
KWT39.2High
FATF grey-list
Lebanon
LBN59.8Very High
FATF grey-listEU high-risk third country
Luxembourg
LUX14.7Very Low
Myanmar
MMR83.7Very High
FATF black-listEU high-risk third countryFinCEN 311 measure
Netherlands
NLD23.1Low
Nepal
NPL53.5High
FATF grey-listEU high-risk third country
Panama
PAN48.3High
EU non-cooperative tax
North Korea
PRK80.9Very High
FATF black-listEU high-risk third countryFinCEN 311 measure
Qatar
QAT30.6Medium
Sudan
SDN59.5Very High
Suriname
SUR47.9High
Syria
SYR78.9Very High
FATF grey-listEU high-risk third country
Turks and Caicos Islands
TCA19.4Low
EU non-cooperative tax
Trinidad and Tobago
TTO47.7High
EU high-risk third country
Ukraine
UKR48.5High
Uzbekistan
UZB42.3Medium
Vanuatu
VUT44.1Medium
EU high-risk third countryEU non-cooperative tax
South Africa
ZAF43.3Medium
Zimbabwe
ZWE45.5High
[ 07 ] How teams use it

From data to defensible decision — in one workflow.

AML country risk lives inside the broader CountryRisk.io Insights platform: scores, source data, AI workflows and reporting all in one place, with full traceability back to the underlying indicator.

01

Pull a score

Look up any of 240+ jurisdictions in the platform, via XLS download, or through the API. Pick the variant that matches the desk.

02

Inspect the drivers

Drill into the four risk sections and their underlying indicators — every value, source and time-series is exposed.

03

Research with AI

Use the AI Assistant and Workflow tools to summarise FATF reports, compare countries and draft commentary — fully cited.

04

Embed & report

Export to PDF, DOCX or Markdown. Pipe scores via API into your CDD, EDD and transaction-monitoring systems.

[ 08 ] Use cases

One model. Five teams.
Many workflows.

Banks

Embed defensible country risk into onboarding, EDD, and cross-border exposure analysis — with full audit lineage back to source.

/ 01Customer onboarding
/ 02Enhanced due diligence prioritisation
/ 03Cross-border exposure analysis
/ 04Customer risk classification & segmentation
[ 09 ] Delivery

API, dashboard, spreadsheet — or all three.

Access AML risk intelligence the way it fits your stack — purpose-built endpoints, integration-ready formats, and an MCP server for AI workflows.

Dashboard interface

Per-desk views, drill-downs, side-by-side country compare, and audit-ready exports.

REST API + MCP server

Versioned endpoints for every variant. MCP server for native LLM and AI-agent access.

Spreadsheet & CSV

Excel-native downloads with full audit trail — one click per variant, per refresh.

Integration-ready

Drop scores into CDD, EDD, TM, and case-management workflows. SDKs in Python, R, TypeScript.

aml-country-risk.pyGET · v2
# Pull EU-variant AML country risk score
import countryrisk

client = countryrisk.Client(api_key="cr_live_***")

score = client.aml.country(
    iso="DE",
    variant="eu",         # eu | us | de | fr | global
    as_of="2026-11-01",
)

print(score.overall)            # 1.9
print(score.tier)               # "low"
print(score.sections.regulation.value)
                              # 1.4  (S02 · weight 30%)
print(score.lists.applied)
# ["fatf_blacklist", "fatf_greylist",
#  "eu_hrtc", "eu_non_coop_tax", "un_sanctions"]
[ 10 ] Why CountryRisk.io

Key differentiators.

What makes the AML Country & Sector Risk Index the defensible choice for compliance teams operating across multiple jurisdictions.

Frequent updates

Monthly refresh cycles plus FATF-plenary-triggered revisions. No drift between regulator action and your data.

Broad risk coverage

Four-section model captures predicate offences, regulation, institutions, and transparency — plus the control environment.

Dedicated sector dataset

A purpose-built sector-level ML/TF intelligence layer — not just country scores wrapped in industry labels.

Transparent methodology

Public weights. Open indicator list. Every score traceable to its source and as-of date. Built for supervisory review.

Jurisdiction variants

Pre-built EU, US, German, and French variants. Bespoke versions aligned to internal policy on request.

AI-generated narratives

Reporting-ready, fully-cited risk rationales for committees, onboarding, EDD, and regulator-facing documentation.

[ 11 ] Licensing & pricing

Pricing that scales
with your team.

Every plan includes the AML Country Risk Score, AI Assistant & Workflow tools, the curated knowledge base, AML newsfeeds, and AML indicator datasets via CountryData.io.

API access to AML risk scores
REST endpoints for global & jurisdiction-specific variants, with monthly refresh.Full developer documentation included.
£6,000 / yr
Bespoke AML risk score & methodology
Custom indicator selection, weights and lists — delivered with a methodology document.Aligned with your internal AML policy.
from £5,000 one-off
Data redistribution rights
License scores for use inside your client-facing products and reports.Scope-based licensing.
on request
Custom SLA
Tailored uptime, response and update commitments for regulated workflows.Annual review included.
from £5,000 / yr
Custom AI templates & prompts
Reporting templates, prompt libraries and AI workflows tuned to your house style.Billed in time blocks.
£250 / hour
Optional services
[ 12 ] Insights

Notes from building
AI-native AML risk.

Methodology releases, regulatory commentary, and the thinking behind how we score countries and sectors.

A Methodology for AML Sector Risk — Draft, Open for Challenge

Read article

Introducing Version 2 of the CountryRisk.io AML Country Risk Methodology

Read article

High-Risk Countries in the German National Risk Assessment — What Does It Really Mean?

Read article

Worldwide Governance Indicators — Looking Under the Hood of the Latest Methodology Update

Read article

What the CSSF Counter-Proliferation Financing Review Means for AML Country Risk Analysis

Read article

Spotting Sanction Evasion and Spillover Risks Through Trade Flows

Read article

Introducing the AML Data Package — Structured, Reliable Country Risk Data at Your Fingertips

Read article

Offshore Financial Centers in AML/CFT Risk Assessments

Read article

Money Laundering: High-Risk Country Classifications

Read article

Some Observations on "Wolfsberg Group: Country Risk Frequently Asked Questions 2024"

Read article
Browse all articles
[ 13 ] FAQs

Common questions from compliance teams.

In today's regulatory environment, AML compliance is both a legal obligation and strategic imperative. Non-compliance can result in substantial fines and reputational damage. AML country risk scores help financial institutions, fintechs, and corporations proactively manage compliance challenges, meet regulatory requirements (including EU AMLD, US FinCEN, and other frameworks), and maintain trust with stakeholders and regulators.
CountryRisk.io provides AML-focused country risk scores aligned with global, EU, and US regulatory expectations. AI-generated narratives explain why a country's AML risk is high or changing, and all AML risk scores and narratives are available via robust APIs.
Unlike static, publicly available indices, the AML scores offer frequent updates (monthly vs. annual), regional customisation (global, EU-specific, US-specific frameworks), AI-generated risk narratives with regulatory rationale, seamless API integration into existing compliance systems, and the ability to create custom scoring models aligned with specific operational needs.
Absolutely. The platform uses AI to automatically generate dynamic country risk narratives and explanations that satisfy regulatory requirements, save analyst time, and provide transparency for internal and external stakeholders.
Yes. Clients can tailor AML models to reflect geography, exposure, and internal risk appetite.
Compliance teams use CountryRisk.io to ensure AML regulatory compliance with automated risk assessments, generate defensible documentation for audits and regulators, monitor regulatory changes across jurisdictions, integrate country risk into transaction monitoring systems, and maintain up-to-date risk profiles that satisfy FATF guidelines and regional requirements.
Ready when you are

Bring transparency and consistency to AML risk assessment.

Deploy quantitative AML country and sector risk intelligence across onboarding, monitoring, and compliance reporting — embedded in your existing workflows.